Back to the "my views" page

Why do we want to keep the field?  
Here are a few good reasons 
Please email me with your reasons to keep the field and comments

• The Anson Field is very special to all who live round it
• The terms of the 7th August 1913 Declaration of Trust (Anson Trust terms of reference) give them no powers to sell land
• How many of us bought our houses BECAUSE of the lovely green field just behind safely protected (or so we thought!) by the Anson Trust for the benefit of the village?
• Howard Cornish Road is already too congested with bus routes, parked cars and drivers avoiding "The Bends" it really can't take any more traffic from housing built on the Anson Field
• Children in the surrounding houses have somewhere safe and close to play without having to cross busy roads or stray more than a few hundred yards from their front doors, how much space will be left for them after the building is finished and how will the new residents react to children playing football in their smaller smart new "green area"?
• A field on the Northern Edge of the village will not be accessible for younger children in the same way as the Anson Field
• It will mean years of noise and disruption during building and loads of construction traffic right in the middle of the village
• Someone will have to have their house knocked down to allow sufficiently wide access to the proposed new houses - or does the plan involve someone selling off most of their garden to create an access onto the field - or will the school have to go first?
• How can they stop the developer who gets their hands on the land from building 150 houses - they will want to make an adequate return on the many millions of pounds they will have to pay the Trust for the land
• The school will not be big enough for the additional influx of children - this will also have to relocate to the edge of the village
• Parents will start to drive their children to the school in the new location in view of the increased distance from the Southern part of the village causing more rush hour congestion
• The Anson Trust are likely to fall foul of The Local Plan with such a large development in the village - they are wasting their remaining cash on a fruitless planning exercise and the only winners will be Dialogue, the planning consultants
• Arthur Anson took a keen interest in the Cricket Club and would not have wanted their historic home dug up for housing
• "Marcham in the '90s - A village appraisal" is full of survey results proving how important to the villagers the Anson Field is
• Please email me with YOUR reasons to field@scilutions.co.uk

Here are just a few of my own concerns as a householder along Abingdon road - our houses are at a substantially lower height than the Anson Field:

• It can only harm property prices for those houses backing on to the field, after all the Anson Field was a great attraction when I bought
• Building on the field may cause increased run-off into our gardens (no more Newnham Courtneys here please!)
• There is already a problem with land from the field slipping down into our gardens, any building work disturbance will only make this worse
• Even a low rise development will create significant overlook owing to the difference in levels between the Anson Field and properties along Abingdon Road

Footnotes

The 2011 Local Plan lists Marcham under policy H11 - NOT MORE THAN 15 DWELLINGS WILL BE PERMITTED  

Moreover it further stipulates i) THE SCALE, LAYOUT, MASS AND DESIGN OF THE NEW DWELLINGS WOULD NOT MATERIALLY HARM THE FORM, STRUCTURE OR CHARACTER OF THE SETTLEMENT; AND ii) IT WOULD NOT RESULT IN THE LOSS OF FACILITIES IMPORTANT TO THE LOCAL COMMUNITY, INCLUDING AREAS OF FORMAL OR INFORMAL OPEN SPACE.

The Anson Field development proposals are in every way contrary to policy H11

Back to the "my views" page